Sunday, June 17, 2012

NBA Finals: Game 3 and the NBA Finals Curse

To read more thoughts from Jason on the Knicks, continue to check here or on his site, http://www.malajas.com/knicks.

I wanted to get a post in before game 3 started on Sunday (6/17/2012).  I just want to say that this has been the epic matchup that we have all been waiting for and it has been evident in the ratings.  A whopping 16.7 million viewers tuned in to watch game 2 of the Finals.  Just to give you some perspective, American Idol is  regularly the top watched show and it drew 15 million and 21 million in the last two shows of its latest season.  If you are one of those people that does not watch basketball, I suggest you turn on the TV this Sunday and give it a try.  In my mind, this is reaching the point like the World Cup in soccer or even the Olympics.  We would never watch these sports regularly, but it is reaching the point where a bit of history is being made.  True greatness is happening right before our very eyes and you do not want to miss out.  You will either be seeing LeBron James or Kevin Durant win their first championship.  Both of these players are the ones who will be carrying the torch (so to speak) for the NBA in the upcoming years and will be entering the conversation of greatest ever in a short time.  This is like watching Tiger Woods win his first Masters or Michael Jordan win his first NBA Finals.  It is not to be missed.

I still believe Thunder will win this series, but it most likely hinges on game 3.  As I stated in a prior post, the winner of game 3 will win the series abot 80% of the time.  And in a series such as this one, statistics matter.  This will be a hotly contested series and will most likely go to seven games.  The winner of game 3 will have the advantage the other team will not be able to dig themselves out of.  That being said, here are my reasons:

1.  Kevin Durant has scored 17 and 16 points in games 1 and 2, respectively.  Meanwhile he has only scored 32 and 36 points.  It feels like he is deferring to his teammates early on, but look for him to take over earlier.  He must know now that he cannot be stopped and will score at least 40 points twice.  I expect a 50+ point masterpiece from him at least one of these times.

2. We have seen LeBron and Wade's all in this series.  They have carried the load and do not have much more.  Their teammates will not continue shooting at these high levels which will leave it all in LeBron and Wade's hands.  I just do not think they have anything left.

3. OKC is more fun.  They can play both ends of the floor better and have proven it.  They just need to play for the whole game.

4. It seems like OKC is on a mission.  Last year, when Dallas won the Western Conference finals, Dirk Nowitzki went through the motions and accepted the trophy, but he left shortly after.  You could tell that he was not satisfied.  The same with OKC and their supporting cast.  When game 1 ended, Kevin Durant went to the sidelines and hugged his friends and family.  They had just won game 1 of the NBA Finals, something new to them and had never happened before in OKC.  A joyous occasion right?  Not to them.  Not one of them even cracked a smile.  When kids come home from school after an uneventful day, they are greeted by smiling parents.  Kevin Durant's family did not express any emotion.  Like Durant, they know there is a mission, and that is an NBA championship.

The NBA Finals Curse

In sports, there are a lot of superstitions.  Some seem to be true, like the Madden curse or the Sports Illustrated Jinx.  When we were going through the Dwightbacle, or Dwight Howard's inability to give his team a firm commitment.  One commentator suggested that the Orlando Magic were cursed.  The Magic reached the promise land in both 1995 and 2009 lead by their All-Star centers, but were promptly dispatched by the eventual champions in just a few games.  They then never went back to the Finals with Shaquille O'Neal or Dwight Howard and the stars eventually left (assuming Howard leaves soon).  I decided to check and see if there was, in fact, a curse.  Did the losers of the NBA Finals retool a little too much and send their teams on a downward spiral?  It is hard to imagine a team that comes so close one year, but then collapses a couple years later.  Let us take a look:

 


NBA Finals Losing Teams 1999 - 2011
Year Team A Few Years Later
1999New York Knicks12/22/2003. The day Isiah Thomas was hired as President of Basketball Operations. The franchise goes in a tailspin
2000Indiana Pacers11/29/2004 Malice in the Palace - 9 players suspended for 146 games
2001Philadelphia 76ersCoach Larry Brown leaves in 2003, coming back to defeat them in 2005 and then going on to win a championship. Best player Allen Iverson demands a trade in 2006
2002,2003New Jersey NetsJason Kidd leaves in 2008, Kenyon Martin traded to Nuggets in 2004, Richard Jefferson stayed until 2008, although many injuries. Now they have to deal with Kris Humphries and his recent divorce with a Kardashian
2004Los Angeles LakersShaquille O'Neal leaves in 2006. Kobe accused of sexual assault in 2003, goes to trial in 2004.
2005Detroit PistonsBen Wallace leaves for more money to the Bulls, the beginning of the end
2006Dallas MavericksMichael Finley leaves to rival Spurs and goes on to win a championship
2007Cleveland CavaliersJuly 8, 2010 - The Decision, LeBron goes from a favorite player to a villain overnight
2008Los Angeles LakersNot much, one of few losing teams to come back and win a championship shortly after
2009Orlando MagicDwightbacle happened, Howard expected to be traded or leave in 2012 or 2013
2010Boston CelticsBig Three breaking up in 2012
2011Miami HeatToo early to tell

 

Looking through this list, not every team went the route of a complete implosion. However, it does appear that the losing teams made a large portion of the negative storylines for the NBA in the last 13 years. Losing stars to free agency or demanded trades seems to be a prominent headline as well, ranging from a seemingly quiet move such as Ben Wallace leaving Detroit to LeBron's decision which became a prime time special on TV. With a few exceptions, such as the Lakers and Mavs, there really is no plan B, and the teams suffer in the division cellars for quite some time. There is no distinguishable pattern except that reaching the top game does shine a certain light on you and many do not deal well. One thing is for certain, and a lesson I learned in third grade: some lose and learn from it, while others just cry about it. Oh yeah, and losing sucks.

Tuesday, June 12, 2012

NBA FINALS: My Prediction

I thought long and hard about this one. But I could not do it, and will have to go with OKC in 7 awesome games. Did not have time to post a full blog today, but will later this week.

Thursday, June 7, 2012

NBA: About 80% and the NBA Lottery

To read more thoughts from Jason on the Knicks, continue to check here or on his site, http://www.malajas.com/knicks.

Quick link.  This video made me respect Kyrie Irving a little more. 

Wow, what a series of unexpected events.  After all four teams controlled home court through the first four games, the Celtics and the Thunder went on to win game 5 in their respective series.  The best part was that they did it on the road.  The Thunder then finished off the Spurs last night coming back from a 15 point deficit at the half.  Unbelievable that a seasoned team like the Spurs would give up such a lead.  I will have to go back to the tapes, but it seems like the Spurs have given up double digit leads in 3 out of the last 4 games.  It could have gone the other way, but the Thunder is just that good.  I thought they were still a year out from reaching their potential (a championship), but they are playing at that other level.  It seems like Durant's shot just gets prettier as the playoffs go on.  And he is also doing it from further and further from the rim.  I am really happy to have caught so much of the playoffs this year.  There have been some truly great games, and being able to watch the Thunder get better as the finals get closer, is right up there with the 2008 season when the big three of the Celtics finally got theirs.  It is always nice to see a team work hard to develop chemistry and have it pay off in the end.

Speaking of the Celtics, they pulled off quite the upset the other night.  I aimed to do write ups of the series early in the weeks, but decided to wait until the game 5's were played.  I was happy I waited.  The Celtics played a mediocre first half but still hung around, followed by a great second half where they traded blows with the Heat and emerged the victor.  I thought they were done when Miami pulled ahead, but they kept sticking around, capping it off with a Paul Pierce 3 pointer over LeBron to put the Celtics up by 4.  Remember ABOUT 80%.  I try to pay attention to all the statistics the talking heads throw at us throughout the series, and 80% is about the percentage that the team will win in many situations.  Whether it be home court advantage, the winner of game 1 or game 5.  For example, whoever wins game 1 goes on to win 76% of the series.  Whoever wins game 5 will win 84% of the time.  If you are a gambler, you now know the odds to take if ever in that situation.  Even still, I am not sure I would take the Celtics in this series.  I know that I did not predict the Thunder or the Celtics to win their series, but this is what I would have wanted to happen.  After the Knicks lost, these are the two teams I would have wanted to see meet in the NBA finals.  Hopefully the Celtics can make that happen tonight.  If not, they only have a 30% chance of winning game 7. 

NBA LOTTERY

With the conspiracy riddled storyline of the Hornets attaining the number 1 pick, I decided to focus on the number one picks of the last 13 years.  You can read all about the conspiracy theorists if you like by simply searching for "NBA lottery conspiracy".  What I wanted to look into was what all the number 1 picks have done.  This should be a no brainer right?  The number one pick should be the easiest pick in all the draft, and their is usually a consensus on who should be chosen.  Here are the last fourteen number one picks and what they have achieved. 



NBA Lottery Number 1 Picks from 1998-2011
YearPlayerDrafted ByPositionNum YearsFinals App.
1998Michael OlowokandiLA ClippersC10 yrs0
1999Elton BrandChicago BullsPF13 yrs +0
2000Kenyon MartinNJ NetsPF12 yrs +2
2001Kwame BrownWashington WizardsC11 yrs +0
2002Yao MingHouston RocketsC9 yrs0
2003LeBron JamesCleveland CavaliersSF9 yrs +2
2004Dwight HowardOrlando MagicC8 yrs +1
2005Andrew BogutMilwaukee BucksC7 yrs + 0
2006Andrea BargnaniToronto RaptorsF/C6 yrs +0
2007Greg OdenPortland TrailblazersC5 yrs0
2008Derrick RoseChicago BullsPG4 yrs +0
2009Blake GriffinLA ClippersPF3 yrs +0
2010John WallWashington WizardsPG2 yrs + 0
2011Kyrie IrvingCleveland CavaliersPG1 yr +0
2012Anthony DavisNO HornetsF/C????
"+" denotes still playing in the NBA

This chart illustrates that there are no guarantees when you have the number one pick. In fact, 4 teams have had two shots at it and it's arguable that only the Chicago Bulls have a chance at a championship in the near future. There are already three players no longer in the league: Olowokandi, Yao Ming and Greg Oden. One supposed golden rule of basketball is that you can't teach height and you will not be faulted for choosing a center. But that line of thinking may be going away. Of the 6 centers chosen in the last 14 years, only Dwight Howard came close and played in the NBA Finals. Most teams seem to be coming to that mindset, as 3 out of the last 4 number one selections have been point guards. Of the 14 players chosen, there have only been 4 MVPs between 2 players: LeBron with 3 of them and Derrick Rose with the other. Finally, I hope that I am not surprising anyone, but there were 4 NBA Finals appearances and no championships. Based on history, it does not bode well for Anthony Davis and the New Orleans Hornets, assuming he is the one chosen.

Teams need to rethink how they choose players. There should be less of an emphasis on the draft. Free agency and trades should be the means to success. For the draft, I would analyze players more on buy in than on talent. It would probably get me fired, but would I want to go through what the Magic have with Dwight Howard? I would probably not pick him based on this past year. I am sure there are ways to evaluate a player to see if they would become a head case. It should not be that hard. I wish the best of luck to Anthony Davis and the New Orleans Hornets, but only one thing is certain when I look at that chart, and that is there are no guarantees.